Join Us

Your Name:(required)

Your Password:(required)

Join Us

Your Name:(required)

Your Email:(required)

Your Message :

0/2000

Ask the Expert: An Interview with Matthew R. Miller, DDS on Sectional

Author: Friday

Jul. 21, 2025

69 0

Ask the Expert: An Interview with Matthew R. Miller, DDS on Sectional

Performing direct interproximal Class II restorations in restorative dentistry can sometimes be challenging and frustrating, especially as it relates to the intricacy of replicating the proper anatomy and contour. Selecting a matrix system that is easy-to-use and one that provides a tight and anatomically correct contact is crucial. A system that is easy-to-use and requires minimal training helps ensure that a clinician and their team can use the system effectively and efficiently. Some matrix systems available on the market are compatible with the other dental instruments and equipment already commonly used in dental offices. This can help ensure that the clinician can integrate the system into their workflow easily. It is also important to choose a system that seals the gingival box and cavosurface margins interproximally. This allows for improved marginal adaptation, minimizes the likelihood for overhangs and excessive flash, and also decreases the risk for marginal gaps and recurrent decay.

Check now

Over time with use, adhesive and composite resin will often accumulate on the ring surface. This build up of resin is not only unsightly, it can cause issues with how well the ring will adapt to the interproximal surfaces of the teeth. If in the event resin adheres to a matrix ring while performing the restoration, it can create difficulties in removing the matrix ring from the restoration without damaging the restoration itself. This is because the composite resin can harden and bond to the matrix ring, making it challenging to separate the two. In some cases, the matrix ring may need to be cut or broken away from the restoration, which can result in damage to the restoration or the need for additional adjustments and contouring. With so many universal bonding agents containing multiple primers within their chemistry, this can cause the adhesive and resin to bond to the surface of the ring unintentionally.

One way to avoid this issue, is to use a matrix system that has a ring with a non-stick surface. The DualForce™ Rings (Clinicians Choice®) tines are coated with a non-stick plastic that prevents adhesive and resin from bonding to it, thus leaving the restoration intact and the ring free of debris accumulation. A design feature such as this can ensure a smoother and more efficient restoration process.

Dental sectional matrix rings can sometimes lose their tension over time, which can affect their performance during restorative procedures. This can be due to various factors such as material fatigue, improper handling, or frequent use. Using high-quality matrix systems such as the DualForce system, will provide consistent tension and accurate adaptation during restorative procedures. The DualForce Rings unique dual-spring technology ensures that the rings maintain their tension over time, even with frequent use. This can help reduce the need for constant adjustments and replacements, saving clinicians time and money.

When rings sit flat against a tooth, it can prevent the ring from being positioned properly. This is especially true for rings that do not offer a wide clearance for access. This can result in a restoration that has an improper contour and poor interproximal contact. It can also prohibit the clinician from treating adjacent teeth at the same time. Improper ring placement can result in many issues including but not limited to: the ring popping off from an unstable placement, poor adaptation of the matrix such that the marginal seal and contour are now compromised, inadequate interproximal contacts, and difficulty placing the material leading to voids, overhangs, and other imperfections.

Some manufactures avoid this problem by creating a large ring circumference with an open access to the teeth in the area being treated. DualForce Rings sit at a 20º angle to allow for clearance away from the teeth cusps and rubber dam clamp as well as provide additional separating force between the teeth. By positioning the rings at this angle away from teeth and rubber dam clamps, it ensures that the ring is ideally seated. Therefore, the separating force in between the teeth is not compromised, nor is the contour of the restoration.

Class II restorations can present several challenges, so when working on a pre-molar or molar with a concavity in the proximal box, the restorative process can become even more difficult. These contours and concavities are due to furcations within the tooth. If these areas are not properly sealed while performing a direct restoration, then marginal leakage and excess overhanging restorative material will result.

The DualForce system includes a “Deep Seal” Active-Wedge that is designed specifically for this clinical indication by providing a tight seal at the base of the proximal box, particularly in cases where there is a concavity close to the furcation. Furcation concavities are usually hard to seal, however the “Deep Seal” wedge makes these situations easy to treat. One side of the wedge has a bubble that applies additional pressure against the matrix to press it firmly against the tooth surface and seal it off. This prevents fluid from seeping in as well as stops restorative material from leaking out causing overhangs. By having the bubble on one side of the wedge only, the rigidity and integrity of the wedge is not compromised.

Sectional matrix systems offer several advantages over traditional Tofflemire band systems. They are customizable, provide better adaptation, reduce the risk of contamination, and offer improved access and visibility.

Sectional matrix systems offer a variety of shapes, sizes, and materials so that the clinician can choose the best option for each individual case for a customized outcome. Better adaptation to the tooth surface results in more accurate and precise restorations with greater marginal integrity than a Tofflemire band. The thin, flexible matrix bands conform to the tooth anatomy, allowing for optimal contours and contacts. The secure fit of the matrix, wedge, and ring help seal out fluids from entering into the preparation during the restorative process. By having a tight fit, fluids such as blood, saliva, and gingival crevicular fluid are kept out; reducing the chances for contamination, and thereby increasing the success of the restoration. 

Sectional matrix systems also provide better visibility during restorative procedures. Their designs allow for better visualization of the tooth surface, making it easier to place and sculpt the restorative material. By using a sectional matrix system, clinicians can achieve more accurate and precise restorations, resulting in better outcomes and greater patient satisfaction.

Circumferential Vs. Sectional Matrix Bands - An Ultradent Blog

Editor’s Note: This blog was authored by Dr. Brett Richins, a full-time practicing dentist in the Salt Lake City, Utah, area. Dr. Richins also works part-time as a member of Ultradent’s in-house clinical team.

COTISEN supply professional and honest service.

As dentists, we are constantly faced with restorative challenges related to variations in anatomy, misaligned or missing teeth, and/or extensive missing tooth structure. There are countless solutions and tools available to help us achieve predictable and exceptional results for our patients.  There are times when selecting the best matrix system for a specific situation will make restoring a tooth much easier and will help us achieve our best possible outcomes. Two of the main categories we can choose from as restorative dentists are circumferential bands (like the Omni-Matrix™ retainer and matrix band) and sectional matrix systems (like the Triodent® system). Criteria for selecting the best system for a specific case can include size of the restoration, location and number of surfaces being restored, presence of adjacent teeth, accessibility, alignment of teeth, long-term plan for the tooth, and personal preference.

Triodent V3 Ring

Omni-Matrix Disposable Retainer and Matrix

Most of us have a go-to process and have become comfortable with a specific system. I have personally learned over the years that there are times when my tendency to always reach for the same tools can make my job more difficult than it needs to be. Sectional matrix bands have become a staple in many dental offices because of the ability for dentists to quickly and efficiently achieve excellent contours, ideal contacts, and well-adapted margins.

There is a learning curve when using a new system, and it is common to want to stick strictly to what we know. When I became comfortable with sectional matrix systems, I unintentionally left circumferential bands behind and never looked back, until I learned about Omni-Matrix bands. There are many situations where I personally have found circumferential bands to be superior and I have changed my approach when starting a restoration. Now, the first thing I do is look at the case holistically and decide what type of matrix system I feel will work best.

3D rendering of a Triodent band.

Sectional matrix systems are my personal go-to when doing a typical Class II restoration with well-aligned adjacent teeth and no missing cusps or extensive missing tooth structure. With a well-designed sectional matrix system, these types of typical cases can be a fast, predictable way to achieve ideal outcomes. However, if we don’t have circumferential bands as one of the tools in our toolbox, it is easy to find ourselves in a frustrating situation that could be avoided.

I personally have some common situations where a circumferential band will be my go-to solution. One of the most common reasons I will prefer a circumferential band is when there is no adjacent tooth or when I am restoring the buccal or lingual surface of a tooth. As a young dentist that was excited about sectional bands and had tunnel vision, I would often find myself rebuilding these teeth “freehand” without any matrix system. A circumferential band can help me quickly and easily place a restoration and keep it confined to the intended area. 

     Seating an Omni-Matrix Disposable Retainer.                                                                                                                                         Removing an Omni-Matrix Disposable Retainer.

Another situation in which a circumferential band can be helpful is when the patient has a missing cusp. This is a situation that often can be done with a sectional matrix, but it may result in an under-contoured restoration if there is not adequate tooth structure to support the ring. Pediatrics can also be a great indication for a circumferential band, as placing a sectional band on a primary tooth can often be difficult and the contours are not as critical. Whereas, a circumferential band will usually be more stable on a primary tooth and can be more efficient when restoring an MOD.

About Dr. Richins:

After earning his bachelor’s degree in biomedical engineering from the University of Utah in , Dr. Richins received his doctorate from the University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine in . He is a member of the Academy of General Dentistry, the American Dental Association, and the Utah Dental Association. He continues to pursue his education and frequently attends advanced courses that cover topics such as Endodontics, Implantology, Cosmetic Dentistry, Oral Pathology, TMJ, Sleep Apnea, and much more. He has also done humanitarian dentistry in underserved areas of Jamaica, Vanuatu, and Appalachia. In addition to practicing dentistry, Dr. Richins spends one day a week working as a Clinical Advisor for Ultradent Products. Ultradent has been developing and manufacturing the highest quality dental products for over 40 years. Dr. Richins’s role at Ultradent allows him to be involved in testing and developing the latest dental products.

Comments

0/2000

Guest Posts

If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!

Your Name: (required)

Your Email: (required)

Subject

Your Message: (required)

0/2000