Join Us

Your Name:(required)

Your Password:(required)

Join Us

Your Name:(required)

Your Email:(required)

Your Message :

0/2000

The top 8 questions about plastic injection moulding - ESCATEC

Author: Adelaide

Jun. 16, 2025

168 0

The top 8 questions about plastic injection moulding - ESCATEC

Plastic injection moulding is a manufacturing process used to create parts for numerous electronic and electro-mechanical products across all market sectors, including industrial, medical, and transportation. It is a reliable and high-quality process in which resin is injected into a mould to produce thousands or even millions of identical items. 

Check now

Injection moulding is widely regarded as a flexible, efficient, cost-effective way of producing quality pieces. However, it's a complex topic, and multiple considerations and questions must be asked to ensure the right solution. If you’re new to injection moulding or looking to start a design partnership, here are eight questions we recommend you consider to achieve the best results.

1. What is the end use of your product?

Injection moulding can be a cost-effective and accurate way of manufacturing many types of products in bulk. However, the purpose of your product will have a massive effect on all the plastic injection moulding decisions you make. 

For example, on one side of the scale, if you are manufacturing a medical device, there may be critical biosafety and chemical stability considerations, as the materials used can cause harm or excrete toxic substances. Or on the other side of the scale, there may be aesthetic considerations if you produce consumer electronic devices. 

Therefore, during the design and manufacturing phases, careful thought should be given to several areas, including the following.

  • Which is the best material to use for the specific product? Choosing the right one will depend on the device's use and application and whether the parts have functional, aesthetic, or mechanical requirements. 
  • Does the product need to be robust? If certain devices break, they can often become hazardous; therefore, materials should be selected carefully to avoid breakages.
  • Does the product need to be used in an extreme environment? For example, will the device be exposed to corrosive substances, heat, liquids, or vibration?
  • Does the final product have any aesthetic requirements? Correct decisions about material selection, mould design, and process parameters must be made if the product needs to look a certain way. 
  • Does the product need to be sterilised? If so, it must be able to resist contaminants to be safe for human use.

Each type of product has its own set of specific considerations, which must be reviewed in the design phase and when the project is being costed.

2. What volume do you need to manufacture?

What volume do you expect to manufacture: a high-volume product, or is your product intended for a niche market? You will have to decide what type of tool you require based on the answer. 

Low-volume plastic injection moulding

Low-volume plastic injection moulding uses a Master Unit Die mould, also known as Modular Unit Die or a MUD tool (and more generically as soft tools). These tools generally produce fewer than 10,000 parts and are suitable for projects that do not require the production of hundreds of thousands or even millions of products. This technology uses easily machined aluminium instead of steel and eliminates the need for an expensive mould base because it only involves product-specific inserts. 

There are several benefits of low-volume injection moulding using a MUD tool. First, this type of production offers greater design flexibility as the tooling can be made quickly, which means new moulds can be created to adapt to changes in the design. Second, it is cheaper to manufacture aluminium tooling inserts than complete steel tooling; thus, there are shorter turnaround times. 

This type of plastic injection moulding is ideal for prototyping, market testing, clinical trial runs, and pilot production. However, there are better methods to use if you need to produce a low volume of products over a long period (between five to seven years).

High-volume plastic injection moulding

Conversely, using a hard tool, high-volume plastic injection moulding can produce hundreds of thousands to millions of products. Depending on your project's requirements, this method has several advantages over low-volume injection moulding.

First, high-volume injection moulding can produce more pieces at faster speeds and is therefore reducing costs due to a higher equipment utilization. Second, it is better suited to automation, once again increasing production capacities and reducing costs. Third, high-volume injection moulding can lower the unit cost as the more-durable steel creates more pieces before it needs to be replaced. However, the operation does have a higher initial cost, and as such, there are likely to be minimum order requirements to cover the significant upfront tooling investment.

The project requirements also influence tool choice

In addition to expected manufacture volume, the product requirements also dictate the type of tool you need to create a successful end product. For example, if your product has optical requirements (no imperfections permitted), you will need to choose a more expensive steel rather than an aluminium MUD tool.

It is a common misconception that the volume of products to be manufactured is the only variable in tool choice: product requirements, specifications, and complexity must all be considered if the final product is to function correctly.

While some OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) design the complete product themselves and outsource only the manufacturing, others see the benefit of working with an EMS (electronics manufacturing services) partner starting from the design phase. Regardless of your route, discussing your project's specifications with your outsourcing partner from the beginning will ensure that the correct tool is chosen. 

3. What is the expected lifecycle of the mould? 

How long an injection mould lasts depends on whether the tool is made from hardened steel or aluminium, what type of plastic is used, the part geometry and how the tool is designed. Depending on these factors, one mould can last between one hundred thousand to one million cycles. And if the mould is well looked after, it will last even longer, making it even more cost-effective.

The most important consideration is having a clear idea of how many parts are required for the product. At the beginning of the project, OEMs and their EMS partner should discuss whether the best option would be to replace the tool during the product lifetime or whether it would be a better option for the tool to last the whole product lifetime.

There is also a third option: to refurbish the tool, which could be a cost-effective choice. However, as the tool will be out of service for a while, planning is required to avoid completely ceasing production.

4. What is the expected lifecycle of the part?

While some plastics degrade relatively quickly when exposed to heat and light, most parts that have been injection moulded will last indefinitely. However, parts being used for functional purposes will eventually reach a point of failure, depending on how they have been treated.

The lifespan of the thermoplastic part produced by the mould depends on the type of plastic used to create it, the application of the part, the part's geometry, how it is stored, stress levels, and temperature. If the part is functional, it will also be subject to wear and tear and tear. Conversely, if the part serves an aesthetic function, its colour and surface will be affected over time. Last, UV light is also a stress factor, so any plastic left outside will, over time, become brittle and break. 

Understanding how these factors influence plastics over time enables making accurate predictions regarding the part's lifecycle.

5. Do you need to create a prototype?

Using a MUD tool may be the best option to create second-stage prototypes as they have been proven to be a good intermediate step between 3D printing and a final steel tool. It can create up to 10,000 pieces, highlighting any problems that may need to be resolved. Also, you can test for form, fit, and function. 

The advantage of using a MUD tool over a 3D-printed prototype is that it has the final material, mechanical properties, precision and surface finish of the mass-produced product. Even vacuum casting in a silicone mould is unlikely to meet these requirements if you are conducting a clinical trial or want to impress initial customers in a field study.

6. What is the correct type of resin to use? 

One of the most critical considerations for a plastic injection moulding project is the correct resin type. As with all the other questions, there is no one-size-fits-all answer, but the right choice depends on a combination of factors relating to function and aesthetics. Choosing the correct resin for the end product will ensure it meets the market needs.

Five considerations will help guide the type of resin used in the project:

  1. Final part appearance, including surface texture, gloss, and colour
  2. The part’s strength, flexibility, or rigidity
  3. Chemical or environmental resistance
  4. Any regulatory requirements 
  5. The part’s life expectancy

There are many different types of plastic with properties relating to flexibility and durability as well as resistance to heat, cold, and chemicals. Various resins are suitable for diverse types of products; for example, some resins are more transparent, others have a high mechanical stability, others are more resistant to chemicals, and others have better capabilities to reproduce the desired geometry accurately and without distortion. In addition, you can add fibres, fillers and other additives to improve mechanical strength, warpage, flammability, and other properties. Finally, choose the right masterbatch to get the colour you want.

Thermoplastics comprise most manufactured polymer resins and are used in injection moulding. There are three main categories of thermoplastics: commodity resins, engineering resins, and speciality resins. 

Commodity resins are easy to process and cheap, which is why they are generally used in everyday, mass-produced items such as packaging and low-end consumer products.  

Engineering resins are expensive; however, they are more resistant to chemicals and environmental exposure and very strong.

High-performance resins are for high-end parts and are also expensive.

7. What is the best type of tool to use?

Whether to use a MUD tool with aluminium inserts or a complete steel tool is one of the most pivotal (and probably most misunderstood) questions in plastic injection moulding. While there are some instances when there is a correct type of tool to use, most projects are not so clear cut; factors such as prototyping, budget, the purpose of the product, and the market play an important role. 

Previously, when considering what type of tool to use, the question was focused on whether to use a hard tool or a soft tool. However, recent technological developments mean that the choice is no longer between steel and aluminium. 

The industry needed to develop, move away from this dichotomy, and invent something that could produce more than just a 3D-printed part and less than a final part. The change was driven by price, speed, and product requirements; for example, it is not possible to create complicated mould structures using a soft tool.

It is beneficial to use different types of tooling for different phases in the product cycle:

  1. Prototype tooling: to ensure the product is correctly designed or for testing
  2. Rapid tooling: to create inserts for injection moulding tools in a short amount of time, typically within a few weeks
  3. Final tooling: to produce the final product
                        MUD tools are typically used for points one and two and complete steel tools for point three.

8. Are you working on a timescale?

Time to market is an important consideration; the quickest time to market will result from an efficient and cost-effective process—not going straight to production without first ensuring the product functions correctly.

For example, directly going to the final production tool can lead to a longer process in certain situations, as design faults or required modifications need to be promptly recognised. For the quickest time to market, all lessons must be learnt by first using a MUD tool to create a prototype before using the final tool. MUD tooling can also improve the efficiency of plastic part output, and software can review the part's design to facilitate quick production. 

Depending on the project, it is also possible to use SLA or SLS 3D printers to obtain a mix of suggestions for the prototype. However, if you chose this prototyping option and there is a gap as you used parts that are not made with 3D-printed simulated resins, you might want to use a MUD tool with the final chosen resin before using the final tools. 

There should always be a bridge between prototyping and production, and MUD tooling can manufacture a feasible prototype for a lower cost and commitment level. Some OEMs can overestimate the number of manufactured units required in the early stages—this is especially true with medical devices—so beginning production with a MUD tool can save time and money before committing to manufacturing.

Choosing the correct tool at the right project stage will optimise timing and cost. Using a MUD tool (or a 3D printer) at the beginning will enable you to establish the best design—once you have done this, you can invest in the right tool for the design. Skipping this process will likely increase time to market as making adjustments after the design has been finalised is more expensive and time-consuming than it is to make changes during the prototyping phase. Focusing on a timeline rather than following a correct process will likely lead to delays at later stages of the project. 

Conclusion 

Plastic injection moulding is a cost-effective and efficient process to produce parts for electronic and electro-mechanical products. However, there is no one-size-fits-all or 'best' solution for every product type. Each project is different and requires the eight questions above (as a minimum) to be carefully considered so a unique process can be established that observes multiple factors: from budget to the product's end use to how many units need to be produced and when. One way to get the correct answer to all the above questions is to speak to an expert plastic injection moulding engineer as soon as possible and work together to find the right solution for your project. 

Prototype Finder supply professional and honest service.

The Basics of Rapid Injection Molding - Machine Design

Designing plastic parts that can be molded has always been important for traditional injection molding processes, but it’s particularly beneficial for parts about to be rapid injection molded (RIM) to ensure speed and quality remain constant during manufacturing. Here’s a look at many of the critical design considerations encountered during rapid injection molding

Rapid Injection Molding

With RIM, CAD models are sent directly to the production floor where mold milling begins. In most cases, molds are fabricated from aluminum, not steel. This allows for faster and more cost-effective tooling compared to traditional steel molds.

RIM accommodates side-action and hand-load inserts, as well as simple overmolding and insert molding. Selective use of electrical discharge machining (EDM) can improve mold features such as corners and edges. And several surface finish options are available. All of this lets RIM make parts in a few weeks rather than the months needed for traditional injection molding methods.

From left to right, the components of a RIM press include: ram (1), screw (2), hopper (3), barrel (4), heaters (5), materials (6), nozzle (7), mold (8), and part (9).

Here are some common applications for RIM:

  • Iterate quickly with rapidly built prototypes
  • Test functions during product development with production-grade parts
  • Test several different materials
  • Test several CAD models
  • Implement bridge tooling
  • Leverage low-volume production for on-demand parts
  • Manage demand volatility
  • Get thousands of parts within days

Part Features for RIM

From wall thickness and radii to ramps and ribs, here’s a quick look at factors designers and engineers should consider if parts will be injection molded.

Wall Thickness: The most crucial design requirement for getting good molded parts is to maintain constant wall thickness. They minimize the potential for warped or distorted parts.

The bosses on the left are poor as they are too thick and might not fill completely, leaving voids. The bosses on the right, however, create strength without having sections that are too thick.

Draft: Draft (slope the vertical walls) as much as possible to make it easier to eject parts without drag marks or ejector punch marks. Draft also lets designers make deeper features, plus it reduces tool chatter and cosmetic defects when milling deep walls. If you can fit it in, use 1 deg. of draft or more. On core-cavity designs, use 2 deg. or more. A rough rule of thumb is 1 deg. of draft for each of the first 2 in. of depth. From 2 to 4 in. of depth, either 3 deg. of draft or a minimum of 1/8 in. thickness may be required.

The green part is the bumpoff.

Pickouts: A pickout is a separate piece of metal inserted into the mold to create an undercut. It is ejected with the part, then removed by the operator and re-inserted in the mold. Using a pickout lets designers overcome shape and positioning restrictions, but is more costly than sliding shutoffs or using a side-action.

Steel Core Pins: These holes can be made with steel core pins in the mold. A steel pin is strong enough to handle the stress of ejection and is smooth enough to release cleanly from the part without draft. There shouldn’t be any cosmetic effect on the resulting part; if there is, it will be inside the hole where it won’t be seen.

Logos and Text: Textured surfaces, molded part numbers, and company logos look good, but be prepared to pay a bit extra for these and other non-mission critical features. That said, permanent part numbers are requirements for many aerospace and military applications. For text, it is recommended designers:
w Use a mill-friendly (san-serif fonts) font such as Century Gothic Bold, Arial, or Verdana.
w Keep the font above 20 pt.
w Don’t go much deeper than 0.010 to 0.015 in.
w Be prepared to increase draft if part ejection is a concern

Tab Gates: Thin edges restrict flow and can break during gate trimming. Tab gates give injection molders a thick area to place a gate into your part. There may be alternatives, so please contact the molder’s applications engineers.

Self-Mating Parts: Identical parts that flip over and mate to themselves are possible and save the cost of a second mold. Elements to let them mate include pegs and holes, interlocking rims, and hooks and latches.

Tolerances: Molders can generally hold about ±0.003 in. machining accuracy. Shrink tolerance depends mainly on part design and resin choice. It varies from 0.002 in./in. for stable resins such as ABS and polycarbonate to 0.025 in./in. for unstable resins such as TPE. There are techniques for getting the most accuracy out of injection molding. Contact an applications engineer at your injection molder for more information.

Material Selection

When choosing a material for a part, relevant properties might include mechanical, physical, chemical resistance, heat, electrical, flammability, and UV resistance. Resin manufacturers, compounders, and independent resin search engines have data online. Here is a quick look at some common commodity and engineering resins.

Commodity Resins

Polypropylene

  • Soft
  • Tough
  • Cheap
  • Chemical resistant
  • Makes good living hinges

Polyethylene

  • Soft
  • Tough
  • Cheap
  • Chemical resistant
  • High density
  • Low density

Polystyrene

  • Hard
  • Clear
  • Cheap
  • Brittle but can be toughened

Engineering Resins

ABS

  • Inexpensive
  • Impact resistant
  • Equipment and handheld housings
  • Susceptible to sink

Acetal

  • More expensive
  • Strong
  • Good lubricity and machinability
  • Very sensitive to excess wall thickness

LCP

  • Very expensive
  • Very strong
  • Fills very thin parts
  • Weak knit lines

Nylon

  • Reasonable cost
  • Very strong
  • Susceptible to shrink and warp, particularly glass-filled
  • Absorbs water, which leads to dimensional and property change

Polycarbonate

  • Moderate cost
  • Very tough
  • Good dimensional accuracy
  • Susceptible to chemical stress cracking, voids

Other engineering resins include PBT, PET, PPS, PSU, PES, and PEI.

Selecting Colorants: Stock colors from the resin vendor are typically black and natural. Natural might be white, beige, amber, or another color. Semi-custom colors are created when colorant pellets are added to natural resins. For available colors, check with your injection molder. In some cases, such as at Protolabs, there is no added charge for our inventory colors. But they may not be an exact match and may create streaks or swirls in parts. Custom colors that need to match an exact Pantone or color chip need to be compounded with a resin supplier. This process is slower and more expensive, but produces a more accurate match.

Resin Additives

Short glass fibers can be added to a resin to strengthen a composite and reduce creep, especially at higher temperatures. They make the resin stronger, stiffer, and more brittle. They can also cause warp due to the difference in cooling shrink between the resin and fibers.

Long glass fibers are used like short glass fibers to strengthen and reduce creep, but make the resin much stronger and stiffer. The downside is that they can be particularly challenging to mold parts that have thin walls and/or long resin flows.

Aramid (Kevlar) fibers are like less-abrasive glass fibers, only not as strong.

Carbon fiber strengthens and/or stiffens a composite and aids in static dissipation. It has the same limitations as glass fibers. Carbon fiber can make plastic very stiff.

Stainless steel fibers are used to control EMI (electromagnetic interference) and RFI (radio frequency interference) typically in housings for electronic components. They are more conductive than carbon fiber.

Minerals such as talc and clay are often used as fillers to reduce costs or increase the hardness of finished parts. Because they do not shrink as much as resins do when cooled, they can reduce warping.

PTFE (Teflon) and molybdenum disulfide are used to make parts self-lubricating in bearing applications.

Glass beads and mica flakes stiffen a composite and reduce warping and shrinkage. With high loading, they can be challenging to inject.

UV inhibitors prevent parts from breaking down in the sunlight for outdoor applications.

Static treatments make resins dissipate static.

If you have any questions regarding injection molding or rapid injection molding, please feel free to call a Protolabs application engineer at (877) 479- or [ protected].

If you want to learn more, please visit our website rapid injection mould(fr,ms,pt).

Comments

0/2000

Guest Posts

If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!

Your Name: (required)

Your Email: (required)

Subject

Your Message: (required)

0/2000